The study team will first establish a baseline traffic count and map traffic patterns of the existing bridge, highway and road network.
With input from residents, stakeholders, neighborhood groups, governments and transportation officials, study participants will define, map and model a series of long-term alternatives.
Initial cost estimates will be developed for each alternative to help compare and evaluate future choices.
The study team will also produce a set of reasonable near-term improvement alternatives that could be implemented over time using a phased approach. These improvements will attempt to preserve future long-term options for the project.
The Urban Land Institute gathered experts from across the country to review the opportunities and provide suggestions about the North Loop in Kansas City. The panelist included:
Glenda Hood, triSect, LLC – Orlando, FL • Dean D. Bellas, Urban Analytics, Inc. – Alexandria, VA • Bill Clarke, Planning Consultant – Ross, CA • David Greensfelder, Greensfelder Commercial Real Estate LLC – San Francisco, CA • April Anderson Lamoureux, Anderson Strategic Advisors, LLC – Boston, MA • Todd Meyer, Forum Studio – Chicago, IL • Adam Weers, Trammell Crow Company – Washington, DC • John Paul Weesner, Kittleson & Associates – Orlando, FL
INITIAL ALTERNATIVES OPEN HOUSE
August 22, 2017
A packet of information about the alternatives is available for your review here:
Public input on the changing needs and goals of the region has informed the initial series of strategies you will see in this survey.
We need your input to further narrow the potential options as the planning team moves forward. Each option on this survey can be rated on a scale of 1-10. Move the slider to the number that best reflects your opinion on the scale.
This survey has 14 questions and should take less than 10 minutes.
At the beginning of a major study like Beyond The Loop, a "Purpose and Need" document is required to clearly identify the criteria by which any proposed alternatives will be judged. This is a "living" document and may be updated throughout the study as additional data, analysis, and public input is collected and completed.
In 2015, MARC formally adopted their metropolitan transportation plan for greater Kansas City - Transportation Outlook 2040. The updated transportation plan provides a policy framework for the investment of federal, state, and local funds based on anticipated needs and regional goals and objectives.
The regional transportation vision established in the plan and carried forward into this PEL study is:
A safe, balanced, multi-modal transportation system that is coordinated with land-use planning, supports equitable access to opportunities, and protects the environment.
From that transportation vision and in-line with the overarching transportation objectives of the region, the Beyond the Loop PEL study needs have been identiﬁed and include:
Beyond the Loop held a scenario planning workshop to kick off the project. Nearly 160 community stakeholders and members of the public gathered at the Downtown Library to participate and share their thoughts on the future of the region. Participants came from downtown, Kansas City, Kansas and the Northland and contributed to the project both in small groups and with live polling. The information gathered will assist the project team as it drafts "Purpose and Need" and begins to identify alternatives that will help the region achieve the future it desires.
Will the study recommend one strategy over the others?
No. The focus of this study is to identify a series of feasible alternatives. While there is no limit to the number of alternatives that can be suggested, the study will help narrow these options using in-depth analysis and modeling.
What does PEL mean?
The Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) process was established by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to provide a more efficient process of evaluating a full range of transportation concepts and identifying preferred improvements. This process allows early planning decisions to be carried forward and speed up future National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities.
The NEPA process is how FHWA determines if a project is eligible for federal funding. A NEPA study examines safety, engineering, neighborhood and community impacts before recommending a preferred alternative to move forward. The PEL study will give the region a head start on the NEPA process that will be required later.
Alternatives studied as part of the PEL process do not have to be financially constrained — that is, it’s not necessary to spell out exactly where the money for future improvements will come from in a PEL study. The PEL process also allows for a longer time horizon to eventually move to project funding and construction.
Baseline traffic counts, mapping, and analysis are underway.
Initial alternatives are identified and modeled.
Results of modeling are presented to public for refinement and comment.
Final set of alternatives are modeled, cost estimated, and analyzed. Final document is prepared.
Final document is available for public comment and prepared for submittal.